Civil law

Practical task 1
Task number 1
Livanov built a residential building, violating the approved project. Instead of a two-storey one, Livanov erected a three-storey house, the living area in the house was 110 sq.m. against 60 stipulated by the project. On the site, Livanov built a greenhouse and a garage, which were not listed under the project, and fenced off an area that was more than twice the size of the one that was allotted to him.
The commission of the village administration refused to accept the house and demanded that Livanov bring the house in line with the project, demolish the greenhouse and garage and move the fence.
Livanov refused to comply with the commission´s demand, arguing that since a contract for the construction of a house was concluded with him, the dispute that arose can only be resolved by a court. In addition, by the time the dispute arose, restrictions on the size of residential buildings erected by citizens had been canceled. For these reasons, Livanov believes that the previously approved project needs to be brought into line with the structures erected on the site.
How and in what order to resolve the arisen dispute?

Task number 2
Which of the principles of civil law is associated with this situation:
A) Sidorov agreed to grant Petrov a deferral to pay the debt;
B) Ivanov was prohibited from trading on the market due to his lack of registration in this locality and the status of an individual entrepreneur;
C) the market administration decided to reduce the cost of renting a place to sell products grown in the area;
D) Kokorin refused to leave his house, intended for demolition in connection with the seizure of a land plot for the construction of a bridge across the river (for municipal needs);
D). the car purchased by him was withdrawn from the buyer, since it was imported into the territory of the Russian Federation in violation of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation;
E) the buyer was denied a discount because he does not have a store discount card;
G) the parent company sold products to the subsidiary at a discount that was not provided to other buyers.

Task number 3
Burtzenkov and Solenov had a two-story residential building on the right of common ownership, and by written agreement between them, the first (brick) floor was occupied by Burzenkov, and the second (wooden) - by Solenov. As a result of the fire, which arose from a lightning strike, the roof of the house and the second floor burned down. Solenov demanded that Burzenkov vacate for him two of the five rooms that were on the first floor, offered to spend the due insurance indemnity to build a roof. Burtzenkov refused this and said that Solenov alone could receive insurance compensation for the burnt part of the house that was in his possession, but he had no right to the part of the house that he occupied, Burzenkov.
Are Solenov´s demands sound? What are the powers of the participants in the law of common property? Justify the answer.

Task number 4
Samsonov left for three years to work under a contract in the Far North, asking his relatives to look after his property, including a residential building. In the absence of Samsonov, his relatives, having decided that Samsonov remained in the Far North for permanent residence, divided his things among themselves. Upon his return, Samsonov filed lawsuits against them for the reclamation of his belongings. Samsonov filed a lawsuit against his brother Peter to claim the house. During the consideration of the case, it was established that Samoilov´s house was dismantled by his brother Peter, transported to another place and installed, but the size of the living space was increased from 43 to 57 square meters. m, the layout was changed (instead of three rooms there were five, the kitchen was taken out of the house into a specially built room), some parts were completely or partially replaced with new ones (frames, floor, roof, foundation). Samsonov demanded that the se