Sidorchuk came to a thrift store to buy a violin. The violin and bow were placed in a case, and the price was marked next to them. Sidorchuk went to the cash register and punched a check for the specified amount. The seller handed Sidorchuk a violin without a bow or case. Sidorchuk began to demand that the bow and case be handed over to him. The seller replied that the price was only for the violin. Justify who is right in this dispute?
According to the purchase and sale agreement, Semenov gave Skvortsov a 2010 Honda Civic car, engine number 19537, a week later Semenov contacted Skvortsov and stated that since the agreement was concluded for the sale of the car, he demands either to pay extra or return to him: the spare tire, tool kit, emergency kit and removable rack. Is Semenov´s demand justified? What should Skvortsov do?
Efimova filed a statement in court in which she asked to declare her husband dead. In the statement, she indicated that Efimov was a member of a fishing collective farm and worked on a seiner as a fish processing foreman. Nine months ago, while intoxicated, he fell out of a boat and drowned; his body was never found. Attached to the application was an accident report and an investigator’s decision to refuse to initiate a criminal case into the death of Efimov. The applicant motivated her request by the fact that the registry office refused to register her husband’s death without a court decision. What should the court do?
4. When the parties entered into contracts for the sale and purchase of goods that were not available at the time of execution of the contracts, the price of the goods was not determined in them, since it was difficult to calculate how much it would cost to manufacture or purchase and deliver them to the buyer. After the execution of the contracts, a dispute arose between the seller and the supplier about the price of the goods at which they should be paid.
How is the price of the goods determined in the contract?
Can it be installed by government agencies?
How to resolve a dispute about the price if it is not specified in the contract?
5. The Freemasons artel provided the head of the HR department, Romanov, with a loan secured by a painting he owned. The painting was moved to the artel premises. The loan was not repaid within the agreed period. As a result of discussing the problem, it was decided to leave the painting behind the artel and offset its value against the borrower’s debt. Romanov really didn’t want the painting to go to the Freemasons. What rights does the pledgee have under the pledge agreement?
5. The Freemasons artel provided the head of the HR department, Romanov, with a loan secured by a painting he owned. The painting was moved to the artel premises. The loan was not repaid within the agreed period. As a result of discussing the problem, it was decided to leave the painting behind the artel and offset its value against the borrower’s debt. Romanov really didn’t want the painting to go to the Freemasons. What rights does the pledgee have under the pledge agreement?
No feedback yet