Content: 18_02_PR5 (1).docx (16.06 KB)
Uploaded: 07.07.2023

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 1
Refunds: 0

$1.46
Practice 5
By decision of the investigator, a forensic accounting examination was appointed based on the materials of criminal case No. 000005, initiated on the grounds of a crime under Part 1 of Art. 325 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in relation to the director of MUP «Boiler p. SSO» Volkov Yew.R.
The investigation established that Yu.R. But, not all acquired by him in 2007. year, inventory items were credited at the warehouse of MUP “Boiler station SSO”.
The investigator posed the following questions for the expert´s permission:
1. What inventory items were acquired by Volkov Yu.R. for the period from 01/01/2007. to December 31, 2007 (name, amount) according to accounting data?
2. Which of the acquired Volkov Yu.R. of inventory items were credited to the warehouse of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise "Boiler station SSO", and which ones were not credited?
For the production of forensic accounting expertise, materials of criminal No. 000005 are presented:
• filing "Advance reports for the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter, 3rd quarter of 2007" for 49 liters;
• filing "Warehouse accounting cards for 2007." for 45 liters;
• filing "Journals-orders for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd quarter of 2007." for 72 liters;
• filing "Counter checks with suppliers for 2007." for 220 l.
Assignment questions:
1. Do the questions put to the experts´ permission meet the basic requirements for the wording of questions?
2. Are the materials submitted for the examination sufficient for giving an opinion?
3. What will be the type of conclusions on the questions posed (categorical, probabilistic, not possible), provided that no more materials are submitted for research?
#судебнаяэкспертиза#готовыезадачи
Dear buyer, the proposed product is recommended to be used as an aid to increase knowledge. All products offered in the store have already been evaluated by teachers and accepted. It must be remembered that legislation may change and some sources (for example, editions of legal acts) may become outdated - they must be edited, as well as the content of the work itself. These works can be an excellent example, but it is not recommended to use the content of the product without making personal adjustments and changes. For example, you can easily add some of your own findings or expand on some of the information already presented. We really hope that this product will be of use to you. We wish you good luck in your studies!!!
No feedback yet