On a winter evening on a busy unlit street

On a winter evening, the owner of the bull terrier, Nurimanov, stopped Mugalimov on a poorly populated, unlit street and, grabbing his arm, demanded to remove a mink coat and gold jewelry. At the same time, the bull terrier, which was without a leash and a muzzle, stood next to the owner and growled. Frightened by the menacing growling dog, Mugalimova broke loose and ran, pursued by Nurimanov. Crossing the carriageway in the wrong place in front of the nearby transport, she slipped and fell three meters from the approaching tank truck controlled by the driver Hransky. Gransky, who drove the vehicle in compliance with the Rules of the Road, took emergency braking measures, but was unable to stop the tanker under icy conditions. Mugalimova fell under the wheels of a tank truck and died from injuries sustained during a collision.
Analyze the objective side of this crime (or these crimes).
Is it possible to assume that Nurimanov committed the crime under Part 2 of Art. 162 of the Criminal Code, that is, robbery using an object used as a weapon?
Expand the rules of causation in criminal law.
Are Nurimanov’s actions causally related to the death of Mugalimova?
Are Hransky’s actions causally related to the death of Mugalimova?
Decide on the existence of a causal relationship between the death of Mugalimova and the behavior of the following individuals:
- the head of the DRSU, who did not organize the processing of the pavement with a sand-salt mixture in icy conditions;
- the operator of urban electricity networks, according to the schedule of energy saving, turned off the lighting on the street where Mugalimova died.