Content: S19-671.docx (17.27 KB)
Uploaded: 29.03.2020

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

$0.2
After the death of eight-year-old parents, Sasha Zyryanov was taken by his uncle. The apartment in which Sasha lived with his parents, he leased for a period of one year. The uncle refused the offer of the guardianship and guardianship authorities to issue an adoption or guardianship, explaining that it was financially difficult for him to support the boy. Five months later, Sasha was placed in a boarding school for orphans. A teacher of a boarding school was appointed Sasha’s guardian, who, in the interests of the ward, went to court with a lawsuit to terminate the lease and evict citizens living there. The court granted her request, and Sasha and his guardian moved into the apartment.
A year later, US citizens, spouses Clinton, arrived in Yekaterinburg to adopt a child. When visiting the boarding school, they liked Sasha, and they applied for adoption to the director of the boarding school and to the education department. The boy did not mind adoption and said that he would very much like to visit America.
The guardian of Sasha gave written consent to adoption only if she secured her right to the occupied dwelling, in which she was registered with the permission of the guardianship authority. Uncle Sasha, considering his property interests and the interests of his nephew violated, demanded that the apartment be transferred to him in trust, so that Sasha, when he becomes an adult, can return to Russia, where he has his own housing.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet