Film studio entered into an agreement with Matveyev, Rudin and Zverev an agreement to write a literary script for a feature film. Under the contract, the authors undertook to submit the script for a fee in five months. The authors were paid an advance on account of the remuneration stipulated by the contract. Three months later, the studio signed a new contract for the same scenario, but with only two authors, Matveyev and Zverev. Since according to the first agreement between the co-authors of the future scenario, each of them had to develop his own version, Rudin continued to work. After the five-month period expired, he gave the studio his own version. However, a studio representative said that Matveyev and Zverev had previously provided a single version of the script, and the studio approved it. Considering his rights violated, Rudin appealed to the court with a request to the studio to pay him all of the amount of remuneration due to the first contract (minus an advance).
Are the requirements of Rudin satisfied? Solve the case.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet