The prosecutor appealed to the court for recognition

684/5000
Prokuror obratilsya v sud s zayavleniyem o priznanii Kirillova ogranichenno deyesposobnym. V zayavlenii otmechalos´, chto odinokiy Kirillov prozhivaya v komnate kommunal´noy kvartiry, zloupotreblyayet spirtnymi napitkami, narushayet pokoy sosedey, kotoryye obratilis´ v prokuraturu s pros´boy prinyat´ v otnoshenii Kirillova neobkhodimyye mery. K zayavleniyu prokurora byla prilozhena spravka psikhonevrologicheskogo dispansera, v kotoroy bylo skazano, chto Kirillov – khronicheskiy alkogolik i nuzhdayetsya v ogranichenii deyesposobnosti. Narodnyy sud vynes resheniye o priznanii Kirillova ogranichenno deyesposobnym.
Pravil´no li resheniye narodnogo suda? Izmenit´sya li resheniye, yesli Kirillov soderzhal prestareluyu mat´?
The prosecutor appealed to the court for recognition of Kirillov as partially capable. The statement noted that a lonely Kirillov living in a room in a communal apartment was abusing alcohol, disturbing the peace of neighbors, who appealed to the prosecutor’s office to take the necessary measures against Kirillov. A statement from the psycho-neurological dispensary was attached to the prosecutor’s statement, in which it was said that Kirillov was a chronic alcoholic and was in need of disability. The people´s court issued a decision recognizing Kirillov as partially capable.
Is the decision of the people´s court correct? Does the decision change if Kirillov contained an elderly mother?