Lebedev sued the Yubileinaya Hotel for the recovery of the cost of a coat, suit, and electric razors that were stolen during their stay. The hotel objected to the claim, referring to the fact that Lebedev was in a dormitory room and, in accordance with the order of the hotel administration, was supposed to hand over things to the locker, working at the hotel around the clock. The said order states that the administration is not responsible for the loss of things from the hotel rooms and not deposited in the cloakroom. This order weighs in a hotel in a prominent place and Lebedev could not be unaware of the rules. Lebedev’s lawyer drew the court’s attention to the fact that the disposal of the hotel’s administration is not a regulatory act and is contrary to Art. 925 of the Civil Code, in accordance with which the hotel is responsible as a keeper and without special agreement on the agreement of persons living in it for the loss and shortage of things brought into the hotel. Representatives of the hotel, in turn, referred to paragraph 31 of the Rules for accommodation in hotels of the city approved by the head of the city in which it is stated that the hotel is not responsible for the loss of things.
What decision must make the court.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet