Content: S18-135.rar (186.30 KB)
Uploaded: 27.10.2018

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

$2
Content
Introduction 3
Main part 5
1 The concept, nature and types of judicial precedents 5
2 The legal position of the Constitutional Court as an example of judicial precedent 11
3 Judicial precedent in criminal proceedings 18
Conclusion 25
Glossary 28
References used 31
List of Abbreviations 34
Applications 35

List of used sources
1 Constitution of the Russian Federation [Text]: Adopted by the All-Union. vote. December 12, 1993 (as amended on July 21, 2014) // Russian newspaper. - 2009. - № (7) 4831. - 21 jan.
2 On the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms [Text]: ETS Convention No. 005 (Rome, November 4, 1950) (as amended and added September 21, 1970, December 20, 1971, January 1, 1990 , November 6, 1990, May 11, 1994) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. - 2001. - № 2. - Art. 163.
3 Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation [Text]: Code of November 14, 2002 No. 138-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 425-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. - 2002. - No. 46. - Art. 4532.
4 In the case of the verification of the constitutionality of the first and second parts of Article 54 of the Housing Code of the RSFSR in connection with the complaint of citizen L.N. Sitalova [Text]: Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 25, 1995 No. 3-P // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. - 1995. - № 18. Art. 1708.
5 On the case of verifying the constitutionality of part two of Article 16 of the Law of the City of Moscow “On the Basics of Paid Land Use in the City of Moscow” in connection with the complaint of citizen T. V. Blizinskaya [Text]: Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of December 13, 2001 No. 16-P // Collected legislation of the Russian Federation. - 2001. - № 52, part 2. - Art. 5014.
6 In the case of verifying the constitutionality of the provisions of part 4 of article 170, clause 1 of article 311 and part 1 of article 312 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of the closed joint-stock company Production Association Bereg, open joint-stock companies Karbolit, Zavod Microwire and Respirator Research and Production Enterprise [Text]: Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 1-P dated January 21, 2010 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - No. 5106 (27). - February 10.
7 Artemyev M. Marberi vs. Madison [Text] / M. Artemyev // Ezh-Lawyer. - 2011. - № 6. - p. 10-15.
8 Baytin MI. The essence of law (modern regulatory legal thinking on the verge of two centuries) [Text] / M.I. Baytin // Law and the State. - 2005. - № 10. - p. 258 - 267.
9 Vengerov A.B. Theory of State and Law [Text]: studies. / А.Б. Vengerov. - M .: Yurist, 2007. - 686 p.
10 A.N. Vereshchagin, On the Meaning of the Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of January 21, 2010 No. 1-P for the judicial system of Russia [Text] /AN. Vereshchagin // Bulletin of civil law. - 2010. - № 3. - p. 183-197.
11 Vorontsova I.V. Judicial precedent in science and practice [Text] / I.V. Vorontsov // Russian judge. - 2008. - № 1. - p. 15-19.
12 Gadzhiev G. A. The Phenomenon of Judicial Precedent in Russia [Text] / G.A. Hajiyev // Judicial practice as a source of law. - M .: Yurist, 2010. - P. 98 - 111.
13 Golovko L.V. Judicial precedent as a non-normative way to legitimize court decisions [Text] /L.V. Golovko // Bulletin of civil law. - 2010. - № 6. - p. 33-35.
14 Guk, PA Judicial precedent [Text]: Theory and Practice / P.A. Hooke. - M .: Norma, 2009. - 128 p.
15 David R. Major Legal Systems of the Present [Text] / P. David. - M .: Science, 1988. - 328 p.
16 V. Ershov. V. Precedents of interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights [Text] /В.В. Ershov // Russian justice. - 2011. - № 1. - p. 32 - 36.
17 Zolotykh V.V. Testing the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings [Text] / V.V. Gold. - M .: Yurayt, 2012. - 320 p.
18 Z
Remember that any ready-made work needs to be finalized and can not be used as an end-product. The work was done in WORD format in accordance with GOST.
No feedback yet