Executive Law Responsibility (2016)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 3
1. The concept and meaning of responsibility in the executive law 5
1.1. The concept of responsibility in the executive law 5
1.2. Features of responsibility in the executive law 11
2. Types of responsibility in the executive law 19
2.1. Property Responsibility 19
2.2. Non-property liability 23
Conclusion 27
References 29

LIST OF USED SOURCES

I. Regulatory and other official documents

1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12, 1993 (as amended on July 21, 2014 No. 11-FKZ) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. No. (7) 4831. 21 Jan.
2. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part One) of November 30, 1994 No. 51-ФЗ (as amended by November 28, 2015 No. 358-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1994. № 32. Art. 3301.
3. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of June 13, 1996 No. 63-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 441-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.
4. Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of December 30, 2001 No. 195-FZ (as amended on November 28, 2015 No. 340-ФЗ) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. № 1 (part 1). Art. one.
5. Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation of November 14, 2002 No. 138-ФЗ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 425-ФЗ) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. № 46. Art. 4532.
6. Federal Law of the Russian Federation of October 2, 2007 No. 229-FZ “On Enforcement Proceedings” (as amended on March 30, 2016 No. 80-FZ) // Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2007. № 41. Art. 4849.

Ii. Practice materials

1. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 30, 2001 No. 13-P “On the case of verifying the constitutionality of the provisions of subparagraph 7 of paragraph 1 of article 7, paragraph 1 of article 77 and paragraph 1 of article 81 of the Federal Law“ On Enforcement Proceedings ”in connection with requests The Arbitration Court of the Voronezh Region, the Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region and the complaint of the Open Joint-Stock Company Razrez “Izykhsky” ”// Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2001. No. 32. Art. 3412.
2. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of November 17, 2015 No. 50 “On the application by courts of law when considering certain issues arising during enforcement proceedings” // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2016. № 1.
3. Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of January 14, 2011 on case No. 39-AD-U-1 // SPS “Garant”: [Electronic resource]. (the date of appeal: 04/04/2016).
4. Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 18, 2011 on case No. 18-AD11-1 // ATP "Garant": [Electronic resource]. (the date of appeal: 04/04/2016).
5. Appeal definition of the Bryansk regional court of March 17, 2016 in case No. 2-967 / 2015 // ATP "Garant": [Electronic resource]. (the date of circulation: 04/05/2016).
6. Appeal definition of the Perm Regional Court of March 16, 2016 in case No. 33-2586 / 2016 // ATP "Garant": [Electronic resource]. (the date of circulation: 04/02/2016).
7. Definition of the Zarechensky Town Court of the Penza Region dated June 4, 2015 in case No. 12-61 / 2015 // ATP “Garant”: [Electronic resource]. (the date of appeal: 04/03/2016).

III. Special literature

1. Akopdzhanova M. O. Criminal liability for concealing money or other property of an organization or an individual entrepreneur, at the expense of which debt and tax collection charges must be collected: author. diss. ... Cand. legal sciences. M., 2011. 27 p.
2. Belousov L.V. The time limit for initiating enforcement proceedings for the recovery of enforcement fees: the gap in the Law on Enforcement Procedure has been eliminated. // Arbitration practice. 2010. No. 1. P. 72 - 75.
3. Gulyaykin SF. Administrative jurisdiction i