Group crime (2017)

CONTENT

INTRODUCTION 3
1. The concept and signs of group crime 5
2. Signs of complicity in criminal law 9
3. Types, forms and problems of qualification complicity 17
CONCLUSION 27
LIST OF USED SOURCES 29

LIST OF USED SOURCES

Regulatory and other official documents

1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation [Text]: Adopted by all. vote. December 12, 1993 (with the last amendment and dated July 21, 2014) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. No. (7) 4831. 21 Jan.
2. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of June 13, 1996 No. 63-FZ (as amended and supplemented as of February 7, 2017 No. 8-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.
3. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended and added March 7, 2017 No. 33-FZ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2001. No. 52 (1 h.). Art. 4921.

Materials of judicial practice

1. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 1, 2011 No. 1 “On the judicial practice of applying legislation governing the specifics of criminal responsibility and punishment of minors” // Russian newspaper. 2011. February 11th. No. 29
2. The verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan of April 10, 2011 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of circulation: 03/05/2017).
3. The verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan of August 8, 2012 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 04.03.2017).
4. Verdict of the Valuisky District Court of the Belgorod Region of July 29, 2011, in case No. 1-62 \\ 2011 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 11.03.2017).
5. The verdict of the Vladimir Regional Court of September 4, 2013 in case No. 2-25 / 2013 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 11.03.2017).
6. Verdict of the Davlekanovsky District Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan of August 25, 2011 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of circulation: 03.03.2017).
7. The verdict of Karabudakhkentsky district court of the Republic of Dagestan of July 18, 2013 in case No. 18-7 / 13 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 13.03.2017).
8. The verdict of the Kataysky District Court of the Kurgan Region of April 18, 2013 in case No. 1-20 / 2013 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 12.03.2017).
9. The verdict of the Kirov District Court of Omsk, dated May 11, 2010, in case No. 45-12-10 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 11.03.2017).
10. The verdict of the Kolpinsky District Court of St. Petersburg dated May 28, 2012 in case No. 1-78 / 12 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 11.03.2017).
11. The verdict of the Leninsky district court of the city of Ufa of the Republic of Bashkortostan dated January 28, 2011 in case No. 1-31 / 11 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of the appeal: 02.03.2017).
12. The verdict of Uchaly district court of the Republic of Bashkortostan of September 17, 2013 in case No. 1-182 / 2013 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant". (the date of circulation: 03.03.2017).

Special literature

1. Babiy N. A. The plurality of persons in crime and the problems of the doctrine of complicity: a monograph. M .: Yurlitinform, 2013. 720 p.
2. Grinko S.D. Responsibility for the organization of the criminal community. // "Black Holes" in the Russian legislation. 2013. No. 1. S. 305-315.
3. July DI. Criminological and socio-psychological aspects of complicity in crime. // Bulletin of Perm University: Series "Jurisprudence". 2012. № 3. P. 206 - 217.
4. Dolgopolov KA. The purpose of punishment for a crime committed in complicity. // Gaps in the Russian legislation. 2012. No. 4. P. 116 - 118.
5. Zhuk O. Features of the subject of proof in criminal cases about the organization of criminal communities (criminal organizations), participation