The authors of the textbook "Classical Mechanics"

Objective 1

The authors of the textbook "Classical Mechanics" entered into a contract with the publishing house, is not indicated in the contract the work was light and the life of the contract. After one year from the date of transfer of the publisher of the manuscript the authors asked, and when their benefits will be released to the public. Not having received a definite answer, they passed this benefit to other publishers, specifying the period of publication. The agreement with the first publisher, they promised to cancel. When the authors reported publisher of termination, publishing them replied that as the term of the contract is not provided, it means that the rights to the benefits given to all publishers, and creators benefit more than any copyrights did not enjoy.
Who in this dispute is right and how it should be resolved, if the author applied to the court? What are the essential conditions of an author´s contract? What is the difference between an author´s contract on transfer of exclusive and non-exclusive rights?
Answer these questions.

Task 2

The team of authors signed a contract with the publisher on the publication of a textbook on physics. Publisher has undertaken considerable work on the preparation for publication of the textbook authors and paid 60% of the remuneration. However, due to lack of funds the publication of textbooks in the light was transferred to another private publishers. The authors found that the manuscript of the second publisher was lost.
When the manuscript is still found, it turned out that the chapter written by the deceased author, has been replaced by the head, prepared by another person without the consent of the heirs of the deceased and a group of authors of the textbook.
Authors interested in: whether it was entitled to publishing without their consent to transfer to another edition of the textbook publishing; to whom and what requirements they could show the loss of the manuscript; how to evaluate the replacement of the head of written dead, head of another author?

Objective 3

The employer refused his request Bykov establish a part-time to prepare for the entrance exams to the university. Bulls challenged the refusal of the employer in the CCC. CBS refused to accept the application on the grounds that it is not subordinated to the CCC.
Name the jurisdiction of labor disputes.
Legitimate whether the refusal of the CCC?
What are the order of the dispute in the CCC.

Task 4

Store manager appealed to the trade union committee with a written submission to agree on the issue of the dismissal of five workers in connection with headcount reductions in claim. 2, Art. 81 of the Labour Code, due to the fact that the reduced amount of work. Trade union consent to the dismissal did not give. Having been refused the trade union, the employer the next day all sellers found part-time work with pay in proportion to the time worked. The employees appealed the actions of the employer to court.
Are the actions of the employer?
What are the basis and procedure for termination of the employment contract due to the downsizing of the staff and workers of claim. 2, Art. 81 of the Labour Code.
Jurisdiction of the court if the dispute.
Make a legal opinion.

Objective 5

As a consequence of late payment of premiums for a quarter of the employees of the three departments of the plant refused to do the work. The employer is required to end the strike and announced to all the rebels of reprimand.
There was whether the organization collective labor dispute?
What are the order of occurrence of collective labor dispute.

Task 6

Murmansk regional court overturned a warning strike carried out by members of the trade union dockworkers Company "Commercial Sea Port" Murmansk ", referring to the violation of workers Part 2 of Art. 410 of the LC RF. The Court found no sufficient proof of a quorum at a meeting of the testimony of witnesses...