Housing law with practical answers 10 questions.

Situation 1

Management Company "Vimpel" appealed to the court against the eviction of his Kozlov from occupying premises (studio apartment) without being given alternative accommodation.

ZAO motivated their demands that Kozlov, who has worked continuously for the company for 12 years, now fired at will, ie, It is not employed by the Company "Vimpel".

What decision should stand trial.

Situation 2

17 year old son Denisova, who is in a 3-room flat state fund room, the size of 18 sqm required to share living space, due to the fact that he is married and his wife is separation from his parents farm. His parents took room 24 sqm, 15 sqm and sister

The parents and his sister agreed to this section, when the son went to court.

Solve the case.

Situation 3

Kraynov, a student of 3rd course of day branch of the Moscow Institute systematically violated the rules of the hostel: a drunk came in a dorm room, home to 3 more people at night disturb rest their classmates. Repeated oral comments commandant dorms did not react.

The institute management has raised the question of eviction from the hostel and Krasnov banned commandant to let him into the hostel. When the Red found out about this, he appealed to the court about his illegal eviction from the hostel, arguing that he had nowhere to live, so I came to Moscow from Novosibirsk.

Solve the case.

Situation 4

Member of the HBC Dobrov systematically paid a share of the occupied with her son living room HBC. After the death of Dobrov one share remained unpaid, and the management of HBC demanded son Dobrov vacate living space, as the son was not a member of HBC. Son Dobrov written declaration of acceptance of him as a member of HBC and agreed to pay the last pie, but the management of HBC did not agree with his proposal. Dobrov son went to court.

Solve the case.


Situation 5

Petrov went to court with a claim for recognition of the right of inheritance for a one-bedroom apartment that her mother had made out to the property by filing all the necessary documents, but died before the registration of the agreement with the appropriate authority of the local administration. Since this apartment belongs to the state housing fund, the management of RG 5 days after the death of the mother of Peter issued a warrant for this residential area, arguing that the contract was not issued until the end and the apartment is state property.

What decision will make the court?

Situation 6

Shakhov used his one-room apartment, located on the 1st floor of the house the LCD as a warehouse of the firm. The house at any time during the day drove the car for loading and unloading goods. It wracking its neighbors and created for them other inconveniences. The local authority at the request of the neighbors warned Shahova the need to use an apartment in accordance with its purpose.

However Shakhov this warning did not react and the local government filed a lawsuit to evict the premises of Shakhov.

What decision should stand trial?

Situation 7

Sokolov with 2 minor children (8 and 9 years) privatized and sold the two-bedroom apartment in September 1998 Kuptsova. When making a purchase and sale agreement was not obtained the consent of the guardianship authority.

In October of 1998. Sokolov died. Her mother went to court in the interests of minor children Sokolova recognize the sales contract invalid on the grounds that there was not the consent of the guardianship authorities.

Kuptsov, the buyer apartments, motivated by the fact that children can be registered at the grandmother, who has a 3-bedroom apartment and live in it alone.

Solve the case.