Examination number 00 on the subject of "Arbitration process"
Code ARP00
Question 1. act on behalf of the plaintiff CEO of the company "Iddis" presented
the court in support of his authority official identification.
As a representative of the defendant - Municipal Unitary Enterprise "Cleaner" to court
He was an assistant janitor, who presented a power of attorney signed by presiding over-lem enterprises and
sealed by the city administration.
On behalf of the plaintiff had filed a petition for non-admission in the process of representatives from func- tion, because it
is not a lawyer, does not have proper legal qualifications are not pre-staged evidence
he is in the state of MUP "The Cleaner."
How are made and confirmed the credentials of representatives to arbitration-rated process?
Question 2. The Executive Director of "Zorro" Surkov has signed a mortgage agreement of non-residential premises owned company in the provision of the loan agreement the company "Sigma" (mortgage agreement of a third party). The cost of the mortgaged premises, was 30% of the value of the company's property. Later it became clear that Surkov had forged the decision of general meeting of the company. Member LLC - Karpov decided to file a suit to invalidate a transaction due to a breach of its findings in accordance with the Federal Law "On general-SHALL limited liability."
Determine the jurisdiction of the case. In response, refer to the rule of law.
Question 3. The Arbitration Court of Perm region took its production of the Company stated, "Energosbyt", located in the city of Perm, challenging the decision of the primordial RF Government, affecting the interests of the applicant in the field of entrepreneurship. When preparing the case for trial, the court found that the dispute referred to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation.
What should the Court in this case?
Question 4.Resheniem Arbitration Court granted the application of "Bolshevik" for the recovery of amounts from the LLC "Trade". Interests of "Bolshevik" was represented by al-WOCAT cats that under the terms of the agreement concluded with him AS paid the WHO-awarding of $ 7 thousand. Rub.
Before the court decision comes into legal force of "Bolshevik" asked the court to declare-leniem for an additional judgment on recovery of costs for the services of a lawyer. Determination of the arbitration court of "Bolshevik" refused to making a decision on the Executive-recovery with "Trade" 'fees Kotova, citing the fact that the matter be settled in a general manner of great-Pitchfork action proceedings.
Are the actions of the court. In what order to be recoverable costs of services representative?
Question 5. Decision of 30 October Arbitration Court satisfied the claim in the case of termination of the lease. November 30 the same year, the defendant in the mail from the rules an appeal with an application receipt for the postal department-tion number 10 of Noyabrsk registered letter addressed to the Court of Arbitration of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District. The definition of 9 December appeal to la returned due to expiration of the deadline for its submission and the lack of a request for restoration of the missed deadline. The court proceeded from the fact that the application is considered filed on the date of its actual receipt of the court, ie December 5th.
Whether lawfully entered the arbitral tribunal?
Question 6. MUP "Sverdlovsk region" applied to the Arbitration Court with the claim of "electricity supply
Organization of Sverdlovsk region "for the recovery of unjust enrichment in the time-least 9 million rubles. In support of the claim MUP "Sverdlovsk region" requested to seize the defendant's funds i
No feedback yet